Rosette ScribePre-visit
The prior note and the patient's context are loaded before anyone is in the room.
One conversation, two documents that hold up.
Rosette Scribe listens to the clinical encounter and produces both halves of the record: a template-faithful note for the provider’s EHR, and a plain-language care plan the patient can actually act on. Each one ships with a receipt showing exactly how it was made.
- Workflow
- 5 stages
Pre-visit through care plan - Note template
- NCFRP / MTOS
9 of 9 sections, payer-reviewed - Patient plan
- 3 languages
English · Español · 中文 - Sign-off
- Always human
Nothing files itself
01 / Workflow
5 stages, one screen.
The provider never leaves the encounter to operate the tool. Each stage hands its work to the next, and the one irreversible step — signing — is the one a human does.
Capture
A speaker-attributed transcript builds live, on the device already in the room.
Draft note
The clinic's own template fills section by section, every line traced to the transcript.
Review & sign
The provider reads, edits and signs. No note leaves Scribe unsigned.
Care plan
The same encounter, rewritten for the patient in their language and reading level.
02 / Two outputs
The same visit, written twice.
A scribe that only produces a note solves half the problem. The provider’s note and the patient’s plan come out of one conversation, and neither is a summary of the other — they are written for two different readers.
Clinical note
For the EHRReproduces the payer-reviewed template the clinic already uses, section for section — including the instruments that must appear verbatim.
TemplateNCFRP / MTOS
Sections filled9 of 9
InstrumentsPHQ-9 · TSK-11 verbatim
Reaches the chartOnly once signed
Patient care plan
For the patientNot a translation of the note. The plan is rewritten for the person who has to follow it — sequenced, plainly worded, and read aloud where that helps.
LanguageEnglish · Español · 中文
Reading levelSimple · Standard · Detailed
Grade band~3 · ~5 · ~8
DeliverySigned link · read aloud
03 / Trust receipt
Every document ships with its own receipt.
Nothing here is a novel algorithm. The work is assembling known-good clinical, security and communication standards behind the scenes — and then showing, on the artifact itself, that they were applied. Trust is not a feeling we hope for; it is infrastructure, and it is legible.
Trust receipt
- Grounded
- 100% of statements traced to transcript + prior note
- Clinical fidelity
- NCFRP / MTOS template · 9 of 9 sections · PHQ-9 + TSK-11 verbatim
- Human sign-off
- Finalized by provider — at signature
- Safety
- Scope-limited · no diagnosis, triage, or decision generated
- Security
- PHI encrypted · subprocessors under BAA · access logged
- Cultural competence
- Patient plan delivered in the patient's language at the chosen reading level
- Observability
- Full session retained for quality review
04 / For clinics
Built around the templates your payers already reviewed.
The usual reason a scribe gets churned out of a clinic is that it cannot reproduce the forms the practice is actually paid against, so staff end up copying and pasting anyway. Scribe starts from the template.
Template fidelity
The note comes out in the clinic’s payer-reviewed structure, with scored instruments carried through word for word rather than paraphrased.
PHI handled properly
Patient data is encrypted, every subprocessor sits under a BAA, and access is logged. The receipt says so on the document, not just in a policy page.
The provider still signs
Scribe drafts; it does not diagnose, triage or decide. Nothing reaches a chart or a patient until a clinician has read it and put their name to it.
Running a clinic that needs its own template?
Tell us which forms you are paid against and we will show you the note Scribe produces from them.
05 / Why this matters
The system usually knows what the patient should do. The gap is getting the plan to make sense for their life.
Adherence is the largest single lever on outcomes and cost, and it is overwhelmingly a communication problem rather than a clinical-knowledge one. A discharge packet handed to someone in clinical English does not produce understanding, and without understanding there is no follow-through. Translation alone does not close it either — reading level, cultural context and whether the plan fits an actual week all decide whether a person acts.
Start with one visit.
Record a single encounter and read both documents it produces. That is the whole evaluation.